First of all we gladly notice that the Browser Security Test was steadily gaining popularity throughout 2004 as can be seen on the graph below. The big peak at the very end of the year is the result of the Browser Test being mentioned on Slashdot website.
An interesting trend is the growing use of Mozilla browsers among the Browser Test visitors. Again the big green dip into Mozilla in the end of the year is due to visitors coming from Slashdot (who are notoriously Linux-minded, and hence more likely to use Mozilla).
This might mean that Mozilla is becoming more and more popular. It may also mean that the Browser Test is becoming more known to people likely to use Mozilla, such as Linux users. On the other hand, as the graph below clearly shows, the majority of Mozilla users who visited the Browser Test run it on Windows, not on Linux or any other operating system.
Since the goal of the Browser Test is to test for vulnerabilities, we can derive some idea of how safe or how vulnerable the browsers of our users generally are. This does not necessarily reflect the vulnerability levels of Internet population in general, because the Browser Test visitors are probably more likely to be security minded. The graph below illustrates the percentage of sessions that resulted in finding at least one high, medium or low risk vulnerability, or no vulnerabilities at all.
The biggest dips into the red happen to coincide with unpatched
vulnerabilities in Internet Explorer. Once a patch is available a
sizeable portion of the users applies it immediately, while the rest
proceed to patch in what looks approximately like
a logarithmic curve. The last two dips correspond to bugs for which
the patches were immediately available. Again we see a slow but steady
patching rate. Still, about 20% of the user population remains unpatched
no matter what.
Page 1 out of 5 Next page